Opinion - Close CA Prisons to Help Address Budget Deficit
Consolidating and closing some facilities could save hundreds of millions of dollars.
The following opinion piece appeared in the Los Angeles Times April 30th. Authored by Assemblymember Phil Ting (D19) and Amber Rose Howard, Executive Director of Drop LWOP Coalition member Californians United for a Responsible Budget (CURB), the opinion advocates the closing and consolidating of prison facilities to address a projected multi-billion dollar budget deficit for the state of California.
Excerpts from the opinion piece below.
*****
California is facing a multibillion-dollar budget deficit that will require lawmakers and the governor to make painful decisions. Nobody wants less funding for their child’s school, road maintenance, environmental progress or other essential services.
There is one area, however, where spending can and should be cut: prisons. Thousands of California prison beds are not in use. Simply consolidating and closing some facilities could ultimately save the state hundreds of millions of dollars.
This can be accomplished safely thanks to important reforms that have confronted our state’s incarceration crisis and reduced its prison population. According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, nearly 130,000 people were in state custody in 2019; by the end of last year, that number had dropped to 96,000, a decrease of about 25%.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has closed two prisons and eight yards — each state prison typically comprises several yards — and discontinued one private prison contract, with another prison closure slated for next year. Even with these reductions, however, the vacancies are equivalent to four or five more empty prisons.
New York offers an example of what’s possible. With a prison population that has halved since 1999, the state has closed dozens of facilities in recent years. Gov. Kathy Hochul has proposed closing five more in the coming fiscal year.
California should follow suit. The state’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office recently estimated that the state could save $1 billion in operating expenses annually and up to an additional $2 billion in capital expenses by closing five prisons. Otherwise, the office expects one-fifth of the state’s prison capacity to go unused.
Do we want updated school textbooks or surplus prison beds? Desperately needed affordable housing or unneeded prison yards? Should we pay people to watch an empty cell or build transportation infrastructure?
Assembly Bill 2178 (introduced by Assemblyperson Ting) answers the governor’s call for prison capacity reductions driven by data and need. It provides a pragmatic and flexible framework for such decisions. It also aligns with Newsom’s vision of a fiscally prudent, forward-thinking California.
*****
You can read the full opinion piece, "Opinion: California’s budget deficit will force difficult cuts. This one should be the easiest," at the Los Angeles Times website.
