Despite months of campaign ads bombarding voters with bodybag imagery, grainy crime scene videos, and threats about dangers awaiting them if the “soft-on-crime” candidate prevailed, Tuesday’s election results suggest that fear mongering about crime was not a winning strategy across the country. Nowhere was this fear-driven narrative more visible than in elected prosecutor contests. Yet in race after race, across red and blue states, the results underscore that communities don’t want to return to past failed practices that drove decades of mass incarceration.
This pattern carried into resounding reelection wins as well. In communities that previously elected a reform-minded prosecutor and saw firsthand the impact of their policies, voters reelected District Attorneys from Texas to North Carolina, Alabama to Indiana, and Vermont to Tennessee. With some races still to be called, reform-minded prosecutors will represent nearly 20 percent of Americans.
The midterm election also saw voters across the country advance criminal justice and legal reform through ballot initiatives.
The use of crime as a fear mongering tactic isn't over, but reform-minded DAs and a growing, educated voter base remain committed to safety and accountability as traditional prosecutors, championing policies that are grounded in research showing that reform makes communities safer and healthier.
To read more details about progressive criminal and legal reform wins from the US Midterm results, visit "Midterm Elections Deliver Some Good News for Criminal Legal Reform" at The Appeal.
We are a nonprofit organization comprised of concerned California community members dedicated to eliminating the felony murder rule. Tax ID #84-3224998