Blog Post

The Waverly Two - Sentenced to Life After Being Found Not Guilty

Heidi • Feb 12, 2024

State Court used a SCOTUS sentencing enhancement to make a finding of guilt by a preponderance of the evidence, even if found not guilty

On February 1st, the Supreme Court of Virginia granted an evidentiary hearing in the case of Terence Richardson and Ferrone Claiborne; two men sentenced to life in prison even though a jury found them not guilty of murdering a police officer.


On April 25th 1998, Officer Allen Gibson was shot in the woods behind the Waverly Village apartment complex in Waverly, Virginia. Gibson was flown to the hospital but later died as a result of his injuries. Before he died, Officer Gibson gave distinct descriptions of his assailants, specifically that “one of them had dreadlocks.” Two witnesses were immediately known to police; a 10-year-old girl who was playing nearby with her 5-year-old cousin and a 15-year-old girl who called 911 after hearing the gunshot. One of those witnesses also described a man with dreadlocks running from the scene.


Despite the detailed description of the suspects given by Officer Gibson and the eyewitness, local investigators undertook what can only be described as a round-up of many young black men in the area. Black males in Waverly were gathered and interrogated until they provided the Investigators with any random name or submitted to a lie detector test. It remains unclear why investigators chose to ignore the witness identification, but on April 26th 1998, Richardson, then 27, and on April 28th, Claiborne, then 22, were arrested and charged with the capital murder of Officer Gibson.


Richardson is short in stature with a slender build and closely cropped cornrows, braided towards the back of his head. Claiborne is tall, with a slender build and a bald haircut. Neither Richardson nor Claiborne matched the description of either assailant as described by Officer Gibson nor the eyewitness.


Initially, Richardson and Claiborne pled not guilty to the charges lodged against them, but fearing the death penalty and what can only be described as inadequate advice of counsel, they accepted plea deals for anyone suspected of killing a police officer. Both men made it clear on record that they maintained their innocence, but accepted plea deals in fear of being put to death. Richardson pled guilty to involuntary manslaughter and Claiborne pled guilty to accessory after the fact of involuntary manslaughter. In March 2000, Richardson was sentenced to ten years in the state penitentiary with five years suspended, followed by two year probation. Claiborne was sentenced to 12 months in custody, which equated to time served and he was released.


Less than a year later, they were indicted by the FBI for the same murder of Officer Gibson, as well as several added drug charges. Terrence and Claiborne were charged with selling hundreds of kilograms of cocaine. yet there were no drugs, proceeds from drugs, proof of drug deals, fancy cars, jewelry, drug paraphernalia, absolutely nothing to support these charges besides testimony from several drug dealers who testified in exchange for their own freedom. 


In September 2001, a jury found Richardson and Claiborne not guilty of the murder of Officer Gibson, but based solely on the testimony of witnesses, they found them guilty of one drug count. The drug conviction would have resulted in a maximum penalty of 20 years. However, the Court enhanced the sentence of Richardson and Claiborne to Life in prison based in large part to the state court guilty pleas, relying on a US Supreme Court Decision (United States v. Watts) which permits the Court to make a finding of guilt by a preponderance of the evidence, even if found not guilty.


Why would someone plead guilty to a crime they didn’t commit? It’s not uncommon, especially when the accused doesn’t have the money and resources to defend themselves in the criminal justice system. The Innocence Project reports 18 percent of known exonerees pleaded guilty to crimes they didn’t commit; 65 percent of those exonerees who pleaded guilty were people of color.


Richardson and Claiborne have continued to maintain their innocence, however, even after being in prison for more than 20 years. To this day, there has been no DNA, blood, or physical evidence linking the two men to this crime.


In 2021, the Waverly Two received support from an unlikely source: the daughter of Allen Gibson, Crissana Gibson, who was 8 years old at the time of her father’s death. During this time, Gibson wrote a statement saying the case needs to be looked at again and that she wants the real man or men responsible for her father’s death to be found and held accountable. She hopes that, if it is found in a new investigation and trial that Richardson and Claiborne are innocent, they will be set free and be given time to begin to heal from this experience.


Jarrett Adams, attorney for Richardson and Claiborne, stated "They’ve never had a day in Virginia state court to call witnesses and prove that police withheld the only identification of the true suspect from them, and they deserve that day."


To read more about this case and the pursuit of exoneration for the Waverly Two, you can read "New Hearing for Man Sentenced to Life in Prison Despite Not Guilty Verdict" from The Appeal. The Appeal is a non-profit news organization that envisions a world in which systems of support and care, not punishment, create public safety and exposes the harms of a criminal legal system entrenched in centuries of systemic racism.

By Heidi 14 May, 2024
In a recent feature from The Guardian, Kelly Savage-Rodriguez, a California Drop LWOP advocate, shares her survival story to help advocate for AB 2354. This bill would allow all abuse survivors to petition the court to vacate their arrests, convictions or adjudications, and order law enforcement and courts to seal records related to the arrest and offense.
From 2016; Death Row cellblock at San Quentin State Prison (Photo: Associated Press)
By Heidi 13 May, 2024
"I am serving a life sentence at San Quentin. I know budget cuts will hurt foster youth," is a commentary piece featured in the San Diego Union-Tribune last week and written by Donald Thompson, who is is serving a life sentence at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center (formerly known as San Quentin State Prison).
Flyer: Saturday May 10th, free community defender resources at the Ross Snyder Rec Center in LA
By Heidi 10 May, 2024
Tomorrow, Saturday May 10, free community defender resources will be offered at the Ross Snyder Recreation Center in Los Angeles from 10a-12 noon.
Election worker interacts with someone detained in the Denver jail. (Photo: Denver sheriff’s office)
By Heidi 08 May, 2024
Last week, the Colorado legislature adopted Senate Bill 72, a first-in-the-nation reform that requires county sheriffs to better work with county clerks to facilitate voting for eligible voters who are confined pre-trial in jails.
AB 2959 - Prioritize families over profits; CDCR visiting room food prices v.. food store prices
By Heidi 07 May, 2024
AB 2959, introduced by Assemblyperson Liz Ortega (D20), seeks to reduce and regulate food prices in California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation visiting rooms, require CDCR to renew and expand vendor contracts to include healthy options, and offer diverse food choices in prison vending machines.
Graphic - AB 2178 (Ting) provides a structured approach to managing surplus in CA state prisons.
By Heidi 06 May, 2024
AB 2178 promotes a more efficient and cost-effective use of taxpayer money by eliminating surplus bed capacity, potentially saving billions and paving the way for closing prisons. Please help us advocate for his bill ahead of hearing in the CA Assembly Appropriations Committee.
By Heidi 02 May, 2024
"California’s budget deficit will force difficult cuts. This one should be the easiest," an opinion piece written by Assemblyperson Phil Ting and CURB Executive Director Amber Rose Howard for the LA Times, advocates for closing and consolidating prison space at a time when prison bed occupancy is already decreasing.
Image of police engaged in arrest in a 2020 Hong Kong protest (Photo: Sandra Sanders/Shutterstock)
By Heidi 30 Apr, 2024
The myth of “superhuman strength;" a descriptor often applied to Black people in police use-of-force cases, dates back to Reconstruction. When “superhuman strength” is allowed as a use-of-force justification in court cases, dehumanizing misconceptions and stereotypes make their way into the wider criminal justice system.
Graphic - Ending girls' incarceration in California is possible
By Heidi 29 Apr, 2024
The Vera Institute of Justice and Young Women’s Freedom Center released ‘Freedom and Justice: Ending the Incarceration of Girls and Gender-Expansive Youth in California,' an in-depth look at the incarceration of girls and gender-expansive youth in California and steps to end their incarceration.
Illustration of a man lifting weights against a bright yellow backdrop (Illustration - Graham Sisk)
By Heidi 26 Apr, 2024
The essay "How I Regained My Self-Esteem in Prison" by Kashawn Taylor, an incarcerated writer in Connecticut, appears on the website for the Prison Journalism Project.
Show More
Share by: