Blog Post

Update on Legislation

Joanne Scheer • Apr 20, 2018

Senate Bill 1437, authored by Senator Nancy Skinner and sponsored by Restore Justice, is a first step to getting legislation passed to reform aspects of the felony murder rule. For those who are offered no relief under SB 1437, we acknowledge and understand your concern and disappointment. Below is our attempt to answer questions you may have and to give insight into the complexities and steps needed to change felony murder.

What is the felony murder rule and how is it implemented in California?

California adopted the felony murder rule in 1872 (Penal Code 189): it states that people can be charged with first degree murder when a death - even accidental, unintentional, unforeseen - occurs during commission of certain felonies, including robbery, burglary, kidnapping, and certain sex crimes. One can commit a robbery or a burglary without any intent to harm, let alone kill someone, but if a death occurs, as for example a gun is fired, or a person is killed in a car chase, ALL people that prosecutors can argue participated in the underlying felony can be found guilty of first-degree murder.

In California, the felony murder rule appears in two areas of our Penal Code:

- Penal Code 189 as felony murder simpliciter for which the penalty is a mandatory 25 years to life (1st degree murder)

- Penal Code 190.2, adopted by the voters in 1978, as felony murder special circumstance. This proposition changed sentencing for felony murder by increasing penalties to 15 to life (2nd degree); 25 to life (1st degree); life without parole and death penalty (special circumstances). There are 22 separate circumstances listed under Penal Code 190.2.

How are these two forms of felony murder different? They are very, very similar but in felony murder special circumstance, the prosecution is supposed to have to prove a higher level of participation - that the person either intended to kill, aided a murder with the intent to kill, or acted with reckless disregard for human life and was a major participant in the crime. How a crime is prosecuted varies from county to county which is why the role of the prosecutor is so decisively important. We know that people who were not major participants have still been sentenced to life without parole and the death penalty under felony murder special circumstance. We understand that these convictions occur in a criminal legal system fraught with problems, including prosecutorial misconduct, discrimination (by race, gender, class, ability, etc.), a lack of understanding of the effects of intimate partner violence, and more.

There are three ways to change laws in California:

- through the courts

- through ballot propositions (voted on by the people of California)

- through legislation - either by simple majority (51%) vote, or by 2/3 majority vote (more challenging)

Legislation must go through 3 separate votes in the Senate, 3 separate votes in the Assembly and then the Governor either signs it into law or vetoes it. SB 1437 is a Senate bill so it begins its journey in the Senate, going through 2 committee votes and one floor vote before making its way to the Assembly where it undergoes the same process. SB 1437 will be heard in Senate Public Safety Committee on Tuesday, April 24th. This is the first step in the voting process.

The goal of SB 1437 is to amend the felony murder rule solely for those convicted under Penal Code 189, felony murder simpliciter, who were not the direct perpetrator of the killing or, more simply, the person who participated in the underlying felony but did not intend, or participate, in the murder. SB1437 changes only Penal Code 189, not Penal Code 190.2 felony murder special circumstance. A simple majority vote (51%) of the Senate and Assembly is needed to change Penal Code 189. In this political climate, a simple majority vote is very possible.

There are two ways to change Penal Code 190.2, felony murder special circumstance: by ballot proposition or by a 2/3 majority vote by the Legislature. To change complex and long-standing laws takes a great deal of strategy as well as the strength and determination of a unified people who are willing to stay the course. Senate Bill 1437 is a strong next step in the fight to take down the giant Felony Murder Rule and its role in fueling mass incarceration and the rise of life without parole sentences. As a broad coalition of groups and individuals, we continue to work intensely and committedly toward the next-step solution for felony murder special circumstance.

From 2016; Death Row cellblock at San Quentin State Prison (Photo: Associated Press)
By Heidi 13 May, 2024
"I am serving a life sentence at San Quentin. I know budget cuts will hurt foster youth," is a commentary piece featured in the San Diego Union-Tribune last week and written by Donald Thompson, who is is serving a life sentence at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center (formerly known as San Quentin State Prison).
Flyer: Saturday May 10th, free community defender resources at the Ross Snyder Rec Center in LA
By Heidi 10 May, 2024
Tomorrow, Saturday May 10, free community defender resources will be offered at the Ross Snyder Recreation Center in Los Angeles from 10a-12 noon.
Election worker interacts with someone detained in the Denver jail. (Photo: Denver sheriff’s office)
By Heidi 08 May, 2024
Last week, the Colorado legislature adopted Senate Bill 72, a first-in-the-nation reform that requires county sheriffs to better work with county clerks to facilitate voting for eligible voters who are confined pre-trial in jails.
AB 2959 - Prioritize families over profits; CDCR visiting room food prices v.. food store prices
By Heidi 07 May, 2024
AB 2959, introduced by Assemblyperson Liz Ortega (D20), seeks to reduce and regulate food prices in California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation visiting rooms, require CDCR to renew and expand vendor contracts to include healthy options, and offer diverse food choices in prison vending machines.
Graphic - AB 2178 (Ting) provides a structured approach to managing surplus in CA state prisons.
By Heidi 06 May, 2024
AB 2178 promotes a more efficient and cost-effective use of taxpayer money by eliminating surplus bed capacity, potentially saving billions and paving the way for closing prisons. Please help us advocate for his bill ahead of hearing in the CA Assembly Appropriations Committee.
By Heidi 02 May, 2024
"California’s budget deficit will force difficult cuts. This one should be the easiest," an opinion piece written by Assemblyperson Phil Ting and CURB Executive Director Amber Rose Howard for the LA Times, advocates for closing and consolidating prison space at a time when prison bed occupancy is already decreasing.
Image of police engaged in arrest in a 2020 Hong Kong protest (Photo: Sandra Sanders/Shutterstock)
By Heidi 30 Apr, 2024
The myth of “superhuman strength;" a descriptor often applied to Black people in police use-of-force cases, dates back to Reconstruction. When “superhuman strength” is allowed as a use-of-force justification in court cases, dehumanizing misconceptions and stereotypes make their way into the wider criminal justice system.
Graphic - Ending girls' incarceration in California is possible
By Heidi 29 Apr, 2024
The Vera Institute of Justice and Young Women’s Freedom Center released ‘Freedom and Justice: Ending the Incarceration of Girls and Gender-Expansive Youth in California,' an in-depth look at the incarceration of girls and gender-expansive youth in California and steps to end their incarceration.
Illustration of a man lifting weights against a bright yellow backdrop (Illustration - Graham Sisk)
By Heidi 26 Apr, 2024
The essay "How I Regained My Self-Esteem in Prison" by Kashawn Taylor, an incarcerated writer in Connecticut, appears on the website for the Prison Journalism Project.
Shelby Hoffman discusses her
By Heidi 25 Apr, 2024
In Florida, and most other states, incarcerated persons are charged for the costs of their time in prison. The practice, called "pay-to-stay," leaves many former offenders with staggering debt.
Show More
Share by: